In the name of "tolerance" and "diversity", Europeans have welcomed millions
of "Islamic refugees" into their countries -- but are they immigrants or invaders?
Check out this video
and decide for yourself. Note: This video has been removed
because it contained "hate speech".
That's exactly why it should have remained
available -- so everyone can hear these people for themselves.
For comments like these, this video was censored. Was this video removed
because of "hate speech" ... or was the intent to "hide speech"? You decide.
"We are not going to integrate and lose our identity. Rather, the Muslim community should be <unknown> and tell the wider society the correct way."
"The domination of Islam is coming."
"Sharia for U.K.!" <chant>
Yes, raise your glass, swing it over your head and chant along. All together now.
"Sharia for U.K.! Sharia for U.K.!"
Don't get me wrong. I am all for freedom of speech and people preaching their gospels
-- as long as the intent is to compete in the arena of ideas. However, with this crowd,
the idea is that you convert -- or else -- and "or else" means you are an infidel and must die.
There is a difference between those who wish to emmigrate to Europe or the U.S.
and become part of our societies, and those who emmigrate as a means of infiltration
and invasion. Make no mistake. Freedom, once again, is under assault.
This time, some in government are welcoming these "refugees" and have no idea they
are letting the wolves in with the sheep. In Europe, this massive "immigration" is nothing
less than national suicide -- and they are learning the hard way.
Oddly, there are those who want to do the same in the U.S.
It's a new twist on an old saying: " 'Come in.', said the fly to the spider. "
If you love "peace", then let's grow our beards, and get measured for our burqas
because the Religion of Peace is very peaceful as long as you agree with them
and live as they say. Otherwise, you can lose your head (or get run over by a rented van).
If we don't turn the tide, they are correct: the future is Islam.
So, what is at stake?
a 30 year old woman, was visting
her fiance' in London. On June 3, 2017, as they were strolling across London Bridge,
a jihadist drove onto the sidewalk mowing her down. Her fiance', Tyler Ferguson,
tried desperately to resuscitate her, but she died in his arms. Christine died
because she found herself on the front line of a "Holy War" of which, most likely,
she was completely unaware. This sad story is becoming all too commonplace and
hits home because it could easily have been a young woman I know named Tiegen ...
... and that's among the most frustrating aspects of events like these.
The liberal left wants us to believe: this is the "new normal", and is
really not different from events like "workplace violence".
If we let everyone immigrate, the immigrants will see what good people
we are, and that we mean them no harm. They, in turn, will be good to us
and we'll all be one, big, happy family.
Much of this type of violence we see in Europe and the U.S. could have been
stopped at the door -- but no.
Government leaders are bending over backward to appear "progressive"
They would rather put their own people at risk than get called bad names
The Western World must make it clear. Immigrants are welcome IF they:
intend to assimilate
will respect our cultures and traditions
intend to abide by our constitutions and laws
Otherwise, they are NOT welcome.
Not all terrorism is caused by immigants. As it turns out, many terrorists
are "home grown" -- but the influence and sheer numbers of those immigrating
who wish to reshape our cultures should not be ignored. World events are proving
recent immigration policies deadly.
Unfortunately, very few generations are exempt from defending freedom.